Do journalists have to protect their sources?

Source protection, sometimes also referred to as source confidentiality or in the U.S. as the reporter’s privilege, is a right accorded to journalists under the laws of many countries, as well as under international law. … To mitigate these risks, journalists and sources often rely on encrypted messaging.

Do journalists have the right to protect their sources?

The idea behind reporter’s privilege is that journalists have a limited First Amendment right not to be forced to reveal information or confidential news sources in court. Journalists rely on confidential sources to write stories that deal with matters of legitimate public importance.

Why do journalists protect confidential sources?

Protecting confidential sources is a cornerstone of ethical reporting. When journalists have agreed to protect someone’s identity, they should make every effort to do so, especially in circumstances where a source could be arrested or harmed.

What protection do journalists have?

Reporter’s privilege in the United States (also journalist’s privilege, newsman’s privilege, or press privilege), is a “reporter’s protection under constitutional or statutory law, from being compelled to testify about confidential information or sources.” It may be described in the US as the qualified (limited) First …

IMPORTANT:  What is the maximum number of member in Central Consumer Protection Council as per Consumer Protection Rules 1987?

Should journalists use confidential sources?

The practice of keeping anonymous sources confidential is essential for journalists who rely on the trust of inform- ants to publicise information that is genuinely in the public interest. If journalists cannot offer protection of the source’s identity, people are deterred from offering information.

What are the rights of journalists?

The right to information, to freedom of expression and criticism is one of the fundamental rights of man. All rights and duties of a journalist originate from this right of the public to be informed on events and opinions.

Can journalists be forced to reveal sources UK?

No court may require a person to disclose, nor is any person guilty of contempt of court for refusing to disclose, the source of information contained in a publication for which he is responsible, unless it be established to the satisfaction of the court that disclosure is necessary in the interests of justice or …

How does the First Amendment protect journalists?

The First Amendment protects both the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press. Journalists have a right to access public places to gather and disseminate news. … In either case, journalists may be provided access similar to the general public.

Do journalists have to reveal their sources in court?

Here’s the problem: Journalists can be compelled by a court to reveal a source’s identity because there is no national shield law granting them an exemption from testifying. If they refuse, they can face prison time or fines.

Who was the reporter that was treated with contempt for protecting source?

Earlier this week, the House Committee on Good Government and Public Accountability threatened to cite The Standard reporter Christine Herrera in contempt unless she named her source for a story about House of Representatives members who allegedly received bribes to approve the proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL).

IMPORTANT:  How much damage does full protection 4 Reduce?

What advice should journalists give to sources who demand confidentiality?

If your source demands confidentiality, make sure you intend to maintain confidentiality if you agree. Also, no matter what you decide, it is a good idea to be clear with your source about what he or she should expect with respect to confidentiality.